…ish
ki yafli neder b’er’k’kha n’fashot lAdonai.
…[when] a man utters a vow according to your value of your soul to
Adonai.
Sefer Vayikra
ends with reminders regarding behaviour and the redemption of objects, of
animals, and of people. Redemption is defined chiefly as “the action of saving
or being saved from sin, error or evil.” Torah uses the word differently.
Redemption is not salvation. It is the clearing of a debt, an exchange of
payment. In fact, we are, in some ways, doing the opposite of the first
definition. We are exchanging the monetary value of something to remove it from
the realm of the holy and bring it into the realm of the profane. With animals
and with objects otherwise pledged to the Temple, this is easy. How many donkeys does one Temple need?
There’s always a need for funds. The same goes for other objects pledged as
kadosh. Why would the Temple need more land or homes? It did not, and so the
system of redemption made sense. Instead of the object or the animal, I shall
give you its value. This created a win-win for all. Pilgrims could travel with
coins instead of their animals or first fruits. The money would not spoil, nor
would it need to be fed. The Temple received the funds to support it.
But a person?
How do we value a person? The number is easy. Value was primarily based upon
the slave market, though one who could not afford this amount was valued by the
Kohain for a lesser amount that would leave him with the means to care for
him/herself. We are expected to give. We are not expected to bankrupt
ourselves. A male adult could do more physical labour, and was therefore valued
higher.
The text,
however, doesn’t only speak to the person’s physical self. “B’er’k’kha
n’fashot lAdonai.” The individual makes a vow
according to his/her own worth. Not only is this how s/he values him/herself,
but the value of his/her soul. It is a weighty matter. How can any of us even
begin to judge to value of our souls? There is of course a practical lesson in
this. Each person making a vow, each person availing him/herself of Temple
service is expected to contribute, not only in a physical, but also in a
monetary way. The slave value gave a tangible scale to measure this.
Nevertheless, I see a greater lesson underlying the p’shat of the text. It is a
lesson beyond monetary value, one well summed up in the lyrics of the song,
“Through Heaven’s Eyes” from “Prince of Egypt.”
Should a man
lose everything he owns
has he truly
lost his worth
or is it the
beginning
of a new and
brighter birth
So how do you
measure the worth of a man
in wealth or
strength or size
In how much he
gained or how much he gave
The answer
will come, the answer will come him who tries
to look at his life through heaven's eyes